http://bidencrimes.info/

The fifth and final volume focuses on the counterintelligence threat, outlining a wide range of Russian efforts to influence the Trump Campaign and the 2016 election. In this volume the Committee lays out its findings in detail by looking at many aspects of the counterintelligence threat posed by the Russian influence operation. For example, the Committee examined Paul Manafort' s connections to Russian influence actors and the FBI' s treatment of reporting produced by Christopher Steele. While the Committee does not describe the final result as a complete picture, this volume provides the most comprehensive description to date of Russia's activities and the threat they posed. This volume presents this information in topical sections in order to address coherently and in detail the wide variety of Russian actions. The events explained in these sections in many cases overlap, and references in each section will direct the reader to those overlapping parts of the volume. Immediately below is a summary of key findings from several sections.

Good to see that you are not refuting the Biden crimes proof. http://bidencrimes.info/

Hunter Biden’s Laptop, Many claims about the laptop’s contents have not been proved, but it played a role in the prosecution of Mr. Biden over a firearm purchase.

Nothing you say is proved while the content of the laptop was used to prosecute hunter. Which shows that the laptop content is real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKPFjAhd3KQ&ab_channel=POLITICO https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX0iAmz9iLM

It is hilarious what you share. It just shows how clueless you are.

He was accused of rape but they could not prove it. Essentially the woman lied about it. So then they made it look like sexual abuse. How can you take a liar’s word? Secondly she made the accusation 23 years later most likely after she was motivated by political interests. Even non liars forget things in 23 years but a liar will choose to believe their lies in that timeframe. Its just a matter of he said she said as there is no concrete proof. So any left leaning court will believe in the thing that is bad for Trump.

In New York, a victim needs to convince a jury that a man put his penis in her vagina without her consent in order to prove rape. This is the layman’s translation of Rape 1, currently defined in criminal statute as forcible compulsion through “penetration, however slight, of the penis into the vaginal opening.”

It’s harder to prove than it sounds, because juries tend to get really hung up on the physics of a rape. Did the penis penetrate or merely have “contact” with the victim’s vagina? What if it wasn’t his penis, but just a finger—perhaps the view taken by some of the jurors in Carroll’s case (though she says both)? If she was also anally penetrated—which is not technically rape—can she be sure that she was also vaginally penetrated? None of this amounts to a hell of a lot of difference to the victim—who has to sit through the humiliation of a trial splitting hairs over which human organ touched which of her body parts and to what degree to the satisfaction of 12 random strangers.

yinale baaiiden ko ke ke dekhekaa chhan arko dhaagomaa hernus.

इची इची भन्दै स्वर्गीय आनन्द लिदै थिई तेरो एक्स बुढी lau k garni hola logan