Logged on sajha today, and saw this on sajha today.....Funny or weired????

aaba aauch hola

haha

Yo thread herda malai euta dai ko kura yaad aayo

           New York ma euta dai Pasal ma kaam gardai hunu hunthiyo

Aani tyo Pasal ma 2 jana Nepali bibahit yubati haru pani kehi saaman kinna aayechan.

yatikai ma euta kale pani pasal ma chirechha.

Aani tyi nepali yubati haru ek aapas ma Nepali Language ma kura garechan " Yo kale le mero ma chirayo bhane ta ma marchu hola hai"

Bichara tyo dai le Ma pani Nepali ho bhanna sakenan aani chup lagera base.

 

 

I don't see anything weird about it. Here we have two ladies chatting about the sexual issues. What is the big deal about it? Only a person with narrow thinking might see a huge issue out of it.

I don't think u got my point. I am not saying those chatting over there are portraying as broad-minded. But what is the big deal about it? You don't make comment on those when u r in yahoo or msn messenger but why when it is in sajha?

As for the defination of broad/narrow minded, it is an abstract term. You have the right to define the may u want and does not necessary mean that it has to be same with everyone.

I think d basic instinct of human is like animals, its our brain which makes us different n civilised frm all other animals. We sud use it in d right path - now its the matter of debate what is d right path. There is no harm in having sexual fantasies but of course using it dat way n in public places remind me of the month of KARTIK when many of d streets of Nepal r full of dog scenes- i think everyone got it........human beings r different dan dogs i guess.

What would have been the rxn if instead of two ladies, two men were talking about the issue? Hope u understand what i am pointing towards. I am not here to preach anyone or enlighten anyone. I would definetely love to hear from others perspective too.

Hey Inanity, u think dat I m preaching genius like u, u got it wrong. U hav changed d topic to gender inequality but I m still firm in my words if it were men, people sud come forward to point out dat. I think u need to define BROADMINDEDNESS in real perspective.

ey Inanity, u think dat I m preaching genius like u, u got it wrong.----Kutumba

Hi Kutumba,

Dude, looks like u take it personally, if u go through each line in my previous posting I don't think I have implied you as a preacher. In that note, if you gonna tell me I am preaching, than I think u got it wrong.

Anyways, the matter of fact is everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. MY OPINION is what i stated in my previous posting. And yes, "I do think" that the topic cannot be analyzed without considering the gender differences.

Let me make this clear too, I am not trying to contradict anyone here. I respect all of yours views as those are yours point of views which are as geniune as mine.

If I say, for instance: "LOOK AT THAT BRUNETTE OVER THERE. WHAT A GREAT FIGURE. I COULD FEEL THE TINGLING DOWN THERE. I WISH I COULD GET LAID WITH HER." 

Do you think its gonna draw the same attention?

insanity, first learn the spelling of definition and come back to define your state of being broad mindedness.

My few words on this.

Reason for my posting is not the chat about sexuality. Neither my motive was to point out any particular gender. I just resist on chating about "sex" in a public forum. Imagine, if you are browsing site in front of your family and then u have to come through this what would u explain about it?

Sajha.com is not meant for browsing in family. Most of the contents are not suitable for family EXCEPT very few threads.

Well... no one can say for sure it is two girls chatting.
I mean..
I can create two new sajha ids with girls name, log on to different computers, and chat and than, log on with another id and create a thread about it and see how many response I get. and laugh at people who comment on it.

Thats what i was thinking khititititi